Example 3. 3 Whom is it addressed to; 1. Daniel Clemente Laboreo. It corresponds to a Proof Line beginning with the word therefore. Rules of Natural Deduction Rules of Implication 1. The symbol A ⇒ B is called a conditional, A is the antecedent (premise), and B is the consequent (conclusion). So, if you know that p is true, you can add any other statement whatsoever to it by means of the disjunctive logical operator and the resulting compound statement will be true. The proof rules we have given above are in fact sound and complete for propositional logic: every theorem is a tautology, and every tautology is a theorem. Let us look at the rules of Table 1. A way of writing this is: 2 Why do I write this; 1. New wffs are generated by applying "rules" to any wff or a group of wffs that have already occurred in the sequence. Normal human reasoning is generally a train of thought moving linearly from the premises to the conclusion. De Morgan's Theorem (DM)~(p∧q) ⇔ (~p ∨ ~q) Addition (Add.) Note, again, that both the inference rules and the rules of replacement are tautologies. Hypothetical Syllogism (HS)p ⇒ qq ⇒ r_________⊢ p ⇒ r Constructive Dilemma (CD)(p ⇒ q) ∧(r ⇒ s)p ∨ r _________⊢ q ∨ s For a discussion that is more detailed than is warranted in the above short introduction, please visit A Primer for Logic and Proof. Prove Modus Tollens 4. A shorter way of saying this is 'if p ⇒ q and p then q.' Equiv. I myself needed to study it before the exam, but couldn’t ﬁnd anything useful (2)A ∨ C[Premise] Distribution (Dist. Modus Tollens (MT)p ⇒ q~q_________⊢ ~p Double Negation (DN)p ⇔ ~~p Last updated - January 20, 2007. 1 What it is for; 3. Addition (Add.) Substitution of a tautolgy in a single wff changes the wff but does not change its truth value; this is what a rule of replacement does. De Morgan's Theorem (DM)~(p∧q) ⇔ (~p ∨ ~q) Constructive Dilemma (P Q) & (R Association (Assoc. The proof rules we have given above are in fact sound and complete for propositional logic: every theorem is … p ⇒ qp_________⊢ q 5. View Rules of Natural Deduction.pdf from PHI 1600 at Borough of Manhattan Community College, CUNY. New wffs are generated by applying "rules" to any wff or a group of wffs that have already occurred in the sequence. Imp. Prove that a contradiction implies any proposition B. Inference Rules               If p ⇒ q is true, and p is true, then q is true. (p ⇔ q) ⇔ [(p∧q) ∨ (~p∧~q)] The sun is not shining. 2 Used symbols; 2. Therefore it is raining. In other words, in any proof, there is a finite set of hypotheses { B, C, … } and a conclusion A, and what the proof shows is that A follows from B, C, …. 2 Basic concepts. Any tautologous conditionals and biconditionals could serve as valid rules of inference; but these are infinite in number. A Natural Deduction proof in PC is a sequence of wffs beginning with one or more wffs as premises; fresh premises may be added at any point in the course of a proof. Commutation (Com. This natural process is mimicked by the "Natural" Deduction Method of Propositional Logic (also called Propositional Calculus, abbreviated PC). The former apply only to entire lines of proof, while the latter apply to components within a line as well as to the whole line. So the major premise is 'All A is C'. For instance, let p stand for 'the sun is shining' and q for 'Mary is at the beach'. In natural deduction rules, the propositions above the line are called premises whereas the proposition below the line is the conclusion. horns'. Either the sun is shining or it is raining. A typical form is: All A is C; all B is A; therefore all B is C. In a Syllogism, one (major premise) contains the term that is the predicate of the conclusion. to infer q Ú s. So from p∧q, we can also infer q, which is the right conjunct. )(p ⇔ q) ⇔ [(p ⇒ q)∧(q ⇒ p)] It becomes ((p ⇒ q) ∧ p) ⇒ q. p q______⊢ p∧q A Natural Deduction proof in PC is a sequence of wffs beginning with one or more wffs as premises; fresh premises may be added at any point in the course of a proof. This method in PC is what is used in mathematics proofs. (New York: Macmillian, 1979), Send suggestions to webmaster@mathpath.org Like formulas, proofs are built by putting together smaller proofs, according to the rules. Simplification 7. So why is this a tautology? )[p∧(q∨r)] ⇔ [(p∧q) ∨ (p∧r)] p∧q _________⊢ p A Syllogism is an argument the conclusion of which is supported by two premises. It consists in constructing proofs that certain premises logically imply a certain conclusion by using previously accepted simple inference schemes or equivalence schemes. Simplification (Simp.) TRUTH TREE RULES FOR IDENTITY AND FUNCTION SYMBOIS Rule #: Close any branch on which s # s appears. Transposition (Trans. (The term "rule of inference" is often used to cover both types.) The predicate of the conclusion in our example is 'is C'. A shorter way of saying this is 'if p ⇒ q and p then q.' All but two (Addition and Simplication) rules in Table 1 are Syllogisms. Let us look at the rules of Table 1. (9)D ∨ B [8, Material Impl. 3 Precedence of operators. Conjunction (Conj): From p and q to infer p∧q Now let us consider an 'instance' of this wff by substituting declarative sentences to stand for p and q. 3. Modus Tollens (MT)p ⇒ q~q_________⊢ ~p 8. For a disjunction to be true, only one of the disjuncts needs to be true. )(p∨q) ⇔ (q∨p)p∧q ⇔ q∧p 1 Who am I; 1. Proof: Colloquially, we call a 'dilemma' a predicament where we have to choose between alternatives neither of which yields a pleasant outcome.